![]() Once again, people are talking about betrayal of trust, violating the GPL, and so on. In various forums online, there are outcries from users of downstream distros… just as there was when the Hat cancelled CentOS Linux a few years ago. We suspect that the wider RHEL user community doesn't care about Stream very much, and that may be a motivation behind the latest move. Or, of course, if you want to build your own copy of RHEL. It's much less useful if you just want to run RHEL without paying. Which is handy if you are a partner company developing products or drivers to run on RHEL, or you're a customer who wants to know what's going to come next. You don't get that with CentOS Stream: It's a preview of the future of RHEL. This is very bad news for downstream projects which rebuild the RHEL source code to produce compatible distributions, such as AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, EuroLinux, and Oracle Unbreakable Linux. However, we've contacted the Red Hat press office, and the company confirmed that the release does say what we got out from reading between the lines. In the opinion of the Reg FOSS Desk, the blog post itself is so full of corporate language that it borders on obfuscatory. In other words, only paying customers will be able to obtain the source code to Red Hat Enterprise Linux… And under the terms of their contracts with the Hat, that means that they can't publish it. From now on it will only be available to customers - who can't legally share it.Ī superficially modest blog post from a senior Hatter announces that going forward, the company will only publish the source code of its CentOS Stream product to the world. Comment Red Hat has decided to stop making the source code of RHEL available to the public.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |